Trinity College in Dublin – Ireland

ByQuest for Justice

In the truth of Trinity College in Dublin – Ireland it is, indeed, necessary to return to text at the beginning of post: Right or wrong case…..

The Criminals…

In the truth of Trinity College in Dublin – Ireland, we in the last sentence promised….. “We will, shortly, start uploading documents of this file.” …..and this is the moment of truth….Linda Doyle-the criminal and irrespective of that the Provost, is expected to explain  why she has not linitiated the legal action against heinous perpetrators of criminal offences Etain Tannam and her accomplice Iain Atack. Trinity College in Dublin is full of legal experts who are certainly aware that the documentation their Provost received (on 11th March 2022) does testify of criminal offences. These legal experts are part of the Truth of Trinity and they also know that monsters Iain Atack and Etain Tannam deliberately and heavily violated Criminal Justice (Theft and Fraud Offences) Act 2001 (see Analysis in the end of this text). It is important to point out that the Provost of Trinity College in Dublin has fully ignored all the documentation she received unconsciously confirming that……

…..”there are two ways to be fooled. One is to believe what isn’t true; the other is to refuse to believe what is true” …..Soren Kierkegaard. 

This is the documentation that the school head insolently rejected to provide the victim with  although he three times unsuccessfully attempted to reach it…. 25th April …. 6th June and 21st June 2013. All in all, what has happened certainly cannot be accepted in any circumstances. Hence, all those legal experts of Trinity College in Dublin are fully aware that section 10.- Criminal Justice (Theft and Fraud Offences) Act 2001 applies.

What Criminal Law Act 1997 says in its Sections 7 and 8 really explains the circumstances.  It is important for Linda Doyle to firmly  have in mind her role in all this and particularly that she has violated these two sections.

Analysis-pg  1-30 31-36                              Appendixes ONE – A to X  TWO – A to I  Figure 4            

To be continued……

Share on Social Media:

Similar Posts

Access to personal data

Access to personal data

ByQuest for Justice

On 26th April 2013 Head of the School received the victim’s request for access to personal data. He requested a copy of any information they keep about him, on computer, in manual form or in any other electronic form. On that occasion the victim also notified Gilian Wylie, Etain Tannam, Ina Merdjanova and Iain Atack…

Share on Social Media:
Right or wrong case

Right or wrong case

ByQuest for Justice

In right or wrong case we wish to underline that both Etain Tannam and the Head ignored the victim’s attempts to reach solution within the school and he, then, addressed Linda Doyle, provost of Trinity College in Dublin hoping that this issue was going to be solved without the Court of International Public. Linda Doyle …

Share on Social Media:
Role of Linda Doyle

Role of Linda Doyle

ByQuest for Justice

As already said after publishing role of Linda Doyle – the Criminal and provost of Trinity College in Dublin what follows is further uploading documents, the victim points to on first page (highlighted in yellow) of the file.  Doyle Linda ignored the documents she received on 11th March 2022. The victim waited nineteen months (Figure…

Share on Social Media:
Case of Etain Tannam

Case of Etain Tannam

ByQuest for Justice

In this post we stress that after several unsuccessful attempts to start studying for a doctorate the victim addressed one of the lecturers at Trinity College in Dublin wishing to reach explanation. These circumstances were not understandable as there was no any reason for what was happening. Namely, lecturers who initially did help the victim…

Share on Social Media: